1. eBay has the FAILzor

    Been scammed on eBay? More than once?

    Me too.

    Well, I’ve never let it get so far that I’ve actually been scammed, because I’m able to read quickly when it’s happening. That is because I’m so familiar with it. Which means, for me at least, that it happens too much.

    I hold eBay responsible for this.

    "sold" eBay items - FAILzor

    In this post I’m going to list a few things I think they can do, and try to explain why it’s their fault.

    The most recent scam was on this item (220367080109, 220362598452), and, if I remember correctly, this was one of those attempts when the successful bidder (if you can call them that) paid well over the odds (alarm bell no. 1), even paying me more of a shipping fee than I requested (alarm bell no. 2).

    They then messaged me through eBay to tell me that actually they wanted the item delivered to a different address (alarm bell no. 3), and that the money was in escrow at PayPal (alarm bell no. 4) and that the money would be released when I emailed them a shipping number (alarm bell no. 5).

    Now in a normal eBay transaction there should be no alarm bells at all. Well maybe no.1 is acceptable as a nice surprise or a bidder that was feeling generous (which would be silly, wouldn’t it.).

    I responded very frankly saying something like, “fuck off” or “I hate you”, and then attempted to inform eBay of what had happened to try to prevent getting charged the fees for this sale.

    (Now I do understand that they’re under no obligation to not charge me for this. They, after all, are not the ones who tried to scam me.)

    The process of informing them of an attempted scam is not simple. In fact, there is no option in the process to identify a scam as the reason for an issue. Only options like, “no payment” or “user is no-longer a member of eBay”.

    This is already getting complicated, isn’t it.

    It’s complicated more if you re-list that item on eBay, because that actually means the item hasn’t been sold yet, and therefore I can’t have been scammed on it now could I!?! Thus the process isn’t available. If I’ve got that wrong, I’m sorry, but that’s because it’s so damn complicated.

    A complicated system can be an advantage to people who are willing to invest the time to work out where it can be gamed. There’s a saying in law that comes to mind: the difference between the letter of the law, and the intent of the law. Which basically means, just because something isn’t technically illegal, that doesn’t mean it’s not, or that it wasn’t intended to be covered by a law.

    I believe that eBay uses this to their advantage. They appear to have a system in place to account for bad behaviour, but actually that system is so complex that bad behaviour still happens because it’s such hard work for a user who’s been taken advantage of, to do anything about it. At the most that means a user has unwittingly sent an item that they’ll never see the money for.. and at the least that means eBay will make it’s fees regardless, because users can’t work out how to make sure they’re not charged.

    To me, that appears to be by design. eBay, that is not a good way to run a business. Profiteering through obscurity may have worked in the past, even recently, but it won’t stand for long.

    Here’s some things eBay should do:

    Community
    There isn’t one currently, and actually, the idea that there should be one isn’t correct. There should be many. I should have community in Ebay. This would encourage peer based review and accountability.

    Less anonymity
    I have no idea who people are, what they’ve done, where they are, who are their friends, or what they’re like. A simple profile page would make a step in the right direction. Let’s add some personality to eBay!

    Better rating and historic analysis
    This one is tough, largely because of the of demographic of typical eBay users. I’m not saying they’re identical to YouTube commenters, but they’re in the same league.

    Look to services like GetSatisfaction and it’s mood smileys:

    GetSatisfaction smileys

    or Facebook “like” links on everything:

    Facebook - "like"

    ..or lastFM for tuning ones musical interests.. all provide ambient methods of conveying an emotion about and action or object. This small granular data will all add up and provide some user information that can be visualised and contextualised.

    Create a beneficial reason to not keep creating new accounts
    Give value back for a long active history, like lower fees, more visibility, or some other bribe. This would have many benefits, the main one being that it would then be easier to identify users who have been around a while, who’ve built up a history and reputation. Users would spot noobs or spammers easier.

    Better templating for the selling of items
    Create some familiarity for users that help them to see quickly the important parts of an item’s auction page, and thus make judgments easier. There’s a lot of noise on eBay, making items easier to scan visually will speed up browsing and highlight points of note better. This is actually done pretty well by third party services, such as iPhone clients.

    Sometimes (in fact I would argue, most times) limiting what a user can do can actually make the experience better, it allows a user to focus on what’s important to them. Most users don’t want to be fussed with writing html for their item page, and in fact, the ability to do that is one of the tools scammers use to sell items such as the packaging of a macbook for as much as the macbook itself. eBay is almost encouraging this to happen currently.

    Longer auctions
    This would reduce the number of auctions that have a flurry of bids in the last few minutes, helping a seller to manage the sale and research the bidders. It would also stabilise pricing and allow for trends to be analysed realistically.

    Item alerts / saved seaches
    Let eBay do the browsing for me, and allow me to tune what I’m interested in. eBay will also learn more about a user based on this. Yes this can be gamed too, but it might encourage more competition as well.

    Restrictions on who can bid
    This is almost already in place, but what about limiting who can bid to two degrees of separation away based on your friends network. Again, social accountability.

    Allow me to communicate with eBay
    Put a phone number on the website, and make it easy to find. Seriously. There is still nothing like actually being able to talk, with sounds coming out of your mouth, to convey an issue, and to resolve a problem.

    Take some ownership
    Good customer service is about helping a customer. When I finally got a response to my communications about the problems I was having, I was basically told to click on a link and fill out a form. The person who wrote that email, if it was actually a person, is in a position to fix my problem right there and then. But instead they moved the responsibility on to me. Frankly, my time is worth more than the fees I’ll recover, thus eBay profits, and I will be less inclined to use eBay again.

    In conclusion…

    eBay doesn’t make me comfortable. It doesn’t make me want to give them money, rather, I resent it. Currently I advise caution to people that ask me about eBay.. but every user should be an ambassador, expressing their amazing experiences and smooth interactions.

    The reality of what eBay sells on TV is prying on the ignorance of the masses. But it should be accounting for that, and helping them to get something good out of it, rather than coming away feeling confused, abused, and alienated.


  2. In desperation, Orange offer me a loan to buy an iPhone

    orange-phoneAdd this to your WTF list, maybe it’s a very telling sign o’ the times.

    This article was originally posted, by me, on the awesome Mobile Industry Review, Where Ewan adds some great background to the story.

    Having had a very quick turn around on a new iPhone order with O2 (I did it online on their store and it arrived roughly 16 hours later!) I called Orange to get my PAC number so I could cancel my contract with them, and move the number i’ve had forever, away from them and to O2. My first call consisted of me being on hold for almost an hour. Although it was at 5.50pm on a Friday, so I figured they’re probably running less staff at that time, and I’d give them a chance.

    My next call, which was immediately after my hour-long top of the pops session, consisted of me pressing * and 0 repeatedly until I spoke to a human. She took my details and passed me on within a couple of minutes to a chirpy guy in the Customer Retention team. He was a bit too happy, that’s probably why he was given that job. Anyone who can be dealing with people who want to *leave* your service, at almost 7pm on a Friday, well… it’s not a job I’d want.

    Somehow he knows I’m leaving to go to O2, is that because that’s what everyone’s doing, or (more likely?) that the mobile operators have access to something central that has a global record of what accounts I hold? A scary thought. Then again, that’s what credit report agencies such as Experian do. Yeah, that is a scary thought.

    So he knows I’m leaving to O2, somehow he also knows it’s because I want an iPhone. I jokingly quip that if he/Orange could give me an iPhone, I’d stay with them. After-all, I’ve had that account for roughly 7 years IIRC, and that’s got to be worth something. (It’s then that I wonder that a Customer Retention team would be much more effective if it’s job was to make me happy *all the time*, not just when I’m trying to leave FFS). He then starts to attack the iPhone, and by proxy, my decision making. This is dangerous ground. He has no knowledge (or does he?) of what I know or what my motivations are. At this point I suggest to him the things that I think the iPhone lacks. I’m trying to play his game, I just want the PAC number, if I play nice then maybe he’ll be easy on me and just let me have it. He disses the camera, I tell him I carry a DSLR everywhere. But then I suggest that, yes, you can’t forward text messages, and that’s annoying. Actually I never do that anyway, and can type quick enough that it doesn’t matter. He seems to be playing along, I’m just hoping his typing I can hear is him retrieving the PAC. Then he mentions that you can’t send picture messages. Oh come on, I have email, and wifi, and 3G, so yeah, you can. But I don’t say that, I just agree. I’m still leaving you dude, gimme the PAC.

    This is getting boring by now, he’s suggesting that they can give me a phone with more features. You don’t need me to tell you that this line of argument isn’t going to work. I tell him that I’ve already got an original iPhone, cracked and running on Orange. I don’t want whatever Samsung they have an excess stock of. I’ve chosen the iPhone for the ecosystem it’s part of, I use Mobile Me, a MacBook, loads of apps I love and couldn’t do without. This is the genius of Apple, this is why and how they changed the game. You my friend, working in a call centre on a friday night, for a faceless organisation that’s fighting, nay struggling, for relevance and market share, you my friend, can not help me. PAC number, now.

    Orange’s inability to predict the future (like most large, oldschool incumbent companies) of it’s own industry, and it’s inability to put me, a valuable flagged customer, first.. This is what’s loosing it’s business, and my cash.

    He knows I’m flagged as a valuable customer, this become obvious when he drops a bombshell. He says casually, sounding like he’s giving up now, that it’s a shame I’ve already made my decision, because they could have given me a loan to buy myself a PAYG iPhone from Apple/O2 and then crack it and use it with Orange.

    Erm, huh?

    So they would effectively give me money to stay with them. They would endorse me using a phone that they can’t support. They would encourage me to break my warranty on my shiny new iPhone. All kinds of wrong.

    This is where I just get annoyed, I haven’t really taken in what he’s just said, I just want the code. Which eventually he agrees to send me. In the post. We’re in 2009, and they’re sending me a letter. I ask if he can give it to me on the phone, now, while I’m here, talking to him, a guy who can see the code on his screen. He can’t. He explains that if I had called several times previously, or if I was an annoyed customer, then he could. But I didn’t fit that profile. Yet.

    I hang up. If O2 can get me an iPhone from an automated system overnight, then surely Orange can get a letter to me in at least the same amount of time, right?

    Regardless of whether or not they could give me a loan to buy the iPhone, there are several reasons why that wouldn’t work out. O2 have the data plan, the free wifi access, the warranty, the OS updates (much easier on a non-cracked iPhone), etc etc.. did I miss something? Oh yeah, I WOULD OWE ORANGE MONEY ON A LOAN.

    This screams of panic, of desperation. They are screwed, and maybe it’s finally hitting home. The game is changing, maybe quicker than we thought. Operators need to give us more reasons to choose one over the other. Currently there is no customer loyalty whatsoever. Competing on price alone, is not how business is done in the 3rd millennium.

    I’ll leave the advice on that for a future article, but I’m sure you, the MIR faithful, can fill them in :)

    Originally posted on Mobile Industry Review.